• Blog
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

  • Archives

    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Categories

    • Housekeeping
    • Worth Considering
    • Worth Discussing
    • Worth Distraction
    • Worth Knowing
    • Worth Reading
    • Worth Seeing

Link Banana

A Vaguely Intelligent Linkblog
« The Fire That Time
Race and the Social Contract »

The Democratic Candidates and Wikipedia #

March 31st, 2008 | In Worth Considering 

For The New Republic, Eve Fairbanks may or may not be reading too much into the effectiveness of Wikipedia editors:

To test the air, I undertook my own little, highly unscientific experiment. I made a professional-looking but somewhat negative edit on each of the candidate’s pages. For Hillary, I wrote a line on the hopelessness of her chances even when you count superdelegates; for Obama, I added a phrase about his loss of some white support. My Obama edit was fully scrubbed within three minutes, by an editor I’d never even seen before. My Hillary edit languished untouched for four hours until Schilling finally got around to deleting it. But, even then, he carefully preserved my skeptical text and pasted it onto the separate history-ofHillary’s-campaign page, a gesture of acceptance. It has remained there, a little wart on Hillary’s Wikipedia face, untouched, ever since.

(via Slashdot)

Interested in similar content on Link Banana?

  • It’s Time for Obama to Drop Out (April 25, 2008)
  • Hillary Clinton, Feminist Cause (June 6, 2008)
  • Bill Clinton More Covered than Any GOP Candidate (January 29, 2008)
  • Obama and the Media (January 28, 2008)
  • Metaphors in the Democratic Primary (May 3, 2008)
Tags: barack obama, dems, eve fairbanks, hillary clinton, politics, slashdot, the new republic, wikipedia

Via BuzzFeed

A david (b) hayes Production

Link Banana is powered by WordPress

THEME: Carter's Line by Ikiru Design

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)