• Blog
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

  • Archives

    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • Categories

    • Housekeeping
    • Worth Considering
    • Worth Discussing
    • Worth Distraction
    • Worth Knowing
    • Worth Reading
    • Worth Seeing

Link Banana

A Vaguely Intelligent Linkblog
« What Makes Terrorists?
MUTO »

The Neural Buddhists #

May 13th, 2008 | In Worth Considering 

I’m sure this isn’t the best David Brooks column in recent weeks, but its another good and interesting one. His contention: the Bible — all dogmatism — is going to have a hard time in the next century.

In unexpected ways, science and mysticism are joining hands and reinforcing each other. That’s bound to lead to new movements that emphasize self-transcendence but put little stock in divine law or revelation. Orthodox believers are going to have to defend particular doctrines and particular biblical teachings. They’re going to have to defend the idea of a personal God, and explain why specific theologies are true guides for behavior day to day. I’m not qualified to take sides, believe me. I’m just trying to anticipate which way the debate is headed. We’re in the middle of a scientific revolution. It’s going to have big cultural effects.

Interested in similar content on Link Banana?

  • Making Procrastination Cost Something (January 22, 2008)
  • The Cognitive Age (May 2, 2008)
  • The McCain Transition (February 1, 2008)
  • The Great Escape (April 22, 2008)
  • More Heaven than Hell (July 1, 2008)
Tags: buddhism, david brooks, dogma, ny times, religion, science

Via BuzzFeed

A david (b) hayes Production

Link Banana is powered by WordPress

THEME: Carter's Line by Ikiru Design

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)